Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Mankind"

A: From what I know it generally just means the human species as a whole.

A: All human race

A: Mankind means humanity, or people of the world.

Example, 'all of mankind is human'

A: humanidade

A: それは人類に自分の絶滅ができると示した。

I'm not sure if you can say '自分’when you're referring to the whole human race. Not sure about 示した either, but tell me if this makes sense.

A: Mankind forced their way into the forests.
He believes mankind can make a change.

A: Correct: how do you think we, mankind, can survive the competition with the AI robots?

Incorrect: how do you think can we, mankind, survive the competition with the AI robots?

You can't put "think can" together because that is like asking "how do you think" and "how do you can" at the same time. "how do you can" doesn't make sense. You need a subject for each verb. It is "you think" and "we can."

However, if your sentence were "Can we, mankind, survive the competition with AI robots?" it would be correct because you have a subject that matches your verb. "Can we?" You don't get mixed up by the other subject with two verbs after it.

"we can" is the sentence form. "can we" is the question form.

In your sentence, the question is "how do you think?" not "can we?"

A: Mankind describes all humans while human being talks about one individually.

Example using mankind:

For many centuries mankind has used this river.

Example using human being:

That person is a kind human being.

A: Mankind and humanity are basically the same, and they represent all of human beings and their ancestors. 'Human being' by itself only means one human, unlike the other two which mean all of human beings.

A: Mankind is talking about the whole earth of people. Human beings is more focused on the species. Mankind sounds more grand.

A: さん、
Thank you so much 😊🌸

A: Check the question to view the answer

A: × How is mankind who has only developed rationality dealt with?
✓
People aren’t necessarily rational in their behavior. Therefore predicting human behavior is not always possible.

× They are cleared away from human society as heterogeneous.
✓
But when considering the entirety of human behavior, rational patterns emerge.

× However, if the mass rationality which is made by mankind is artificial intelligence, this works as supplement for people's irrationality, and it is possible that the supplement makes the partnership between mankind and artificial intelligence.
✓
The ‘wisdom of crowds’ is widely understood to be a rational choice. Artificial intelligence is the result of infinitesimal number of learning iterations that result in an action that is also rational. A partnership between the wisdom of a crowd and artificial intelligence could be very beneficial.

I have had some fun with this. Frankly your writing is not understandable to me. Best regards.

A: × It is debatable whether our mankind can solve the most serious problems in the world in this generation.
✓ It is debatable whether mankind can solve the most serious problems in the world, in this generation.

× Some people say it would be possible as science technologies progress astonishingly.
✓ Some people say it would be possible since science and technology advances at an astonishing rate.

× However, I think those problems will be perpetual because there are a lot of issues which were considered to be solved rapidly, but still remain, and anyone cannot promise that no more problems will occur.
✓ However, I think those problems will be perpetual because there are a lot of issues which were considered to be rapidly solvable but still remain, and no one can promise that no more problems will occur.

× To begin with, a lot of problems are still threatening the world even at this moment.
✓ To begin with, a lot of problems are still threatening the world, even at this moment.

× Surprisingly, some of them were thought to be dealt with soon.
✓ Surprisingly, some of them were thought to be easily solvable.

× When I was a kid, many people including me believed that we would merge with North Korea soon, which would relieve us from the fear of war.
✓ When I was a kid, many people, including me, believed that we would merge with North Korea soon, which would relieve us from the fear of war.

× Despite this belief, our country is still separated into two and no one knows when we can be one again.
✓ Despite this belief, our country is still separated into two, and no one knows when we can be one again.

× I bet there are other issues in the similar situation as ours.
✓ I bet there are other issues in similar situation as ours.

× Some people say even if new evils threaten us, we can get around them with up-to-date technologies and sciences.
✓ Some people say, even if new evils threaten us, we can get around them with up-to-date technologies and sciences.

× Looking at this Covid 19 issue, I think it is one of the most severe problems in the world, it has been about 3 years since the disease appeared though.
✓ Looking at the Covid 19 issue, I think it is one of the most severe problems in the world. It has been almost 3 years since the disease appeared.

× Even with our brilliant medical skills, we barely prevented the small evil from engulfing the earth.
✓ Even with our brilliant medical skills, we barely prevented the small threat from engulfing the earth.

× Like no one could expect we would face the Covid 19 issue, different crises in many ways will come to us out of blue.
✓ No one could have predicted we would face the Covid 19 issue. Different crises, in many ways, will come to us out of the blue.

× All things considered above I am confident it is impossible to solve the most serious problems in the world.
✓ All things considered, I am sure it is impossible to solve the most serious problems in the world.

A: thank you very much,

A: Personally, I do not think it's discriminative. But if you want to play it safe, you can use "people"